Beautiful movies have captured my imagination for many years. These days I do not go to the movie theater nearly as often as I did when I was a teen, but certain films from that era left an impression.
I remember watching the Bourne movies (Identity, Supremacy, Ultimatum) in theaters. While not appealing to everyone, the shaky, handheld camera enhances the action sequences. These are not films to be watched while swiping through a phone. Each shot conveys meaning through subtle, fleeting details.
The strength and compelling nature of Matt Damon’s performance as Jason Bourne is in the vulnerability he maintains through all three films. From the first shot he is bereft of knowledge, unable to find his place in the world. He accepts help and support. He slowly learns the horrifying truth about who he was, what he has done.
Damon’s facial expressions are muted, a man trying to protect himself by revealing almost nothing, but in those moments when his training and instincts kick in you can see it in his face. He fights to protect himself, to protect others, and most critically in the second movie to apologize. It is a rare action movie where the plot hinges on the journey towards a sincere apology.
In the third movie he reveals that he sees the faces of people he has killed. He is not a machine, despite the efforts of those who sought to control body and break his mind. He remains haunted by fleeting memories.
I recently watched the three Bourne movies and shortly after saw In The Grey, a new movie directed by Guy Ritchie.
Bourne v. Grey
In the Bourne films the drama is emotional. Yes, there are extremely well choreographed and executed fight scenes, but Bourne is not a man who carries an arsenal or drives flashy cars. He occasionally uses firearms, but a lot of the combat is hand to hand using found objects. He defends himself with a pen, a towel, a rolled up newspaper, a swiped bottle of alcohol. He is opportunistic, snagging keys to mopeds, jumping into unattended vehicles, he travels light.
His emotional center is Marie, with whom he built is a relationship over the course of two films. Her death is sudden and carries a resonance that guides his actions for the better. While the backdrop of the moves are cities across Europe and around the world, the films do not present the life of an assassin as a desirable one. The “assets” sent to kill Bourne, are often notified of their targets while lying down, staring blankly into space, in empty darkened rooms.
In the third Bourne movie the importance of his relationship with Marie is underscored when another woman (Nikki) enters his sphere. Though there are mirroring scenes where both women dye their hair as a disguise, the movie makes it clear Nikki is not Marie. The women are individuals. They are not interchangeable accessories in Bourne’s story.
Ironically there is nothing subtle about In The Grey. The colors are bright, the characters are plain as day. There is no hidden agenda. Perhaps the best performance is from Rosamund Pike, who unfortunately is not in nearly enough scenes to make the movie watchable. In some ways it feels like she is in a separate film of her own. At times she is menacing and poised, but she is also willing to make herself look deeply uncool.
There is a scene partway through the movie where she is running on a treadmill, hunched over, in the dark. She is sweaty and awkward. In the last scene of the film she slouches in her chair staring nervously at a red landline phone on her desk, which is frankly ridiculous. Who uses a landline anymore? I suppose the implication is that she is tied to the phone in that office for eternity.
In any case, Pike’s acting only highlights the lack of emotional gravitas displayed by the movie’s main actress, Eliza Gomez. The first thing I noticed about Gomez was her lips, and then I could not unnotice them. While sharing a scene, she contrasts strikingly with Pike, whose lips look proportionately natural, like they belong to her face.
Eliza Gomez may be good in some films, I do not know, I have not seen her act in anything else, but in this film her character falls flat in a number of ways.
She is supposedly a high-powered attorney, but you never see her speak in front of the judge. You only witness as she stands while the judge decides in her favor. Repeatedly. This is deeply unimpressive. Maybe they didn’t want to hire a lawyer to fact check courtroom exposition. It’s a shame because the movie is chock full of exposition. So. Much. Exposition.
Gomez makes coffee over exposition of how she is taking down the empire of this evil billionaire via her hired men (Gyllenhaal and Cavill). There may be actors who could make this scene interesting, but she is just making coffee. Yes, she’s in a fancy office, in a fancy outfit, with her employee/admirers looking on. But she’s still just making coffee.
Then there are the “boys” and their toys.
Jake Gyllenhaal shows off a garage full of brightly colored ATVs/explosive devices/bikes, etc. and details what all of them are. I have been on dates this bad, with men who brought me outside the restaurant to show me their cool car, not realizing that the only way I would be impressed is if they never mention it at all.
Gyllenhaal and Cavill hire more men for their squad, “the boys” but how they all know and trust each other is never fully explained, or perhaps it was and it didn’t leave an impression. In any case, the boys look cool. They do cool shit, looking cool.
They call Gomez “mom” for some reason. I get that it’s supposed to be ironic, but there are no moments of affection or interpersonal connection that would warrant this term of endearment. They do not even touch her or each other in comfort or kindness. There are no stories or personal moments shared, no way to empathize with their experience. Are they afraid, regretful, defiant? Why have they taken on this extremely dangerous job? You’ll never know and his movie will never tell.
After killing round upon round of the billionaire’s nameless henchmen move towards them like swarming ants, one of the boys makes a sacrifice. He blows up a house with himself inside, taking out most of the remaining henchmen. Which character was he? I don’t know. I did not care that he died, did not care that anyone died. The other characters (his supposed friends?) spend about 10 seconds thinking on his death before promptly moving on. By comparison, the loss of two small planes (aka “toys”) holds greater emotional weight in the film than any loss of life.
The movie reads like a video game. It is a movie I imagine a boy who has spent too much time playing video games would make. There are silent women who lounge around the billionaire’s pool as mere ornaments. The plot is completely at the mercy of the male gaze aesthetic.
Partway through the film Eliza Gomez inexplicably visits a tent in the middle of the desert. A vacation in Wadi Rum, perhaps? Who knows, but no matter. She is there to acquire the outfit. A cream and tan safari-type outfit that she wears for days as a hostage, in a jail cell and on the run. The outfit remains pristine (much like her hair). She is untouchable. Without any flaws or depth of character, she is an accessory.
Everyone and everything in this film is an accessory. The boys, too, are barely there. Henry Cavill is a handsome face, but he could be replaced by someone else (someone cool) and the movie would go on just the same. The movie has a shiny, unreal quality that makes it clear you are there to see explosions, and not much else.
In Bourne there are people who treat humans as accessories. They are a group of powerful men who believe themselves to be the deciders of the world, of life and death. The Bourne movies break down the many ways in which they are wrong.
Guy Ritchie made an entire movie on the premise of humans as accessories. Perhaps this is not what he meant to do, but that is how it reads. You will not remember the faces of those who died. In his film they barely lived.
Conclusion
Ritchie has done better work with the same actors. I saw The Man from U.N.C.L.E., and while perhaps not the best film of all time, I did care about the characters and found the drama and interpersonal dynamics to be compelling. The Gentlemen TV series (I’ve only seen the first season), was shockingly good in character development, comedy and set design. I watched it multiple times.
Unfortunately, In the Grey is so much wasted potential. It felt like the director’s mind was somewhere else, just off to the side of the action, only turning back in time to watch the next explosion.
No part of this essay, or any of my writing, is written or edited by AI.

































